THE REGULATE MARIJUANA LIKE
ALCOHOL ACT 2012 V4 (902 words)

Meet our Chief Proponent: James P. Gray,
is a retired Superior Court Judge from Orange County, California.
Judge Gray is the author of several books including Why Our Drug Laws
Have Failed: A Judicial Indictment Of War On Drugs, Wearing the Robe:
The Art and Responsibilities of Judging in Today's Courts, and A
Voter's Handbook: Effective Solutions to America's Problems.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, recognizing that it is time to
tax marijuana and to regulate its use, hereby repeal all California
state laws that prohibit marijuana possession, sales, distribution,
transportation, nuisance laws, production, storage, processing, and
cultivation by people 21 years of age and older, and thereby remove
marijuana from any other statutes pertaining to the prohibition,
regulation and scheduling of controlled substances, whether now
existing or enacted in the future, except those related to driving a
motor vehicle while impaired by marijuana; using or being
impaired by marijuana in public or in the workplace; providing,
transferring or selling marijuana to a person under the age of 21; the
use, possession, cultivation, sales, furnishing, transporting, or
storing on premises of marijuana by people under the age of 21; and
medical marijuana statutes as set forth in California Proposition 215
and its progeny. This act adopts the definition of marijuana as
it is presently set forth in Health and Safety Code section 11018.
The People further direct and order the California state legislature to
enact reasonable regulations and establish reasonable taxes for the
establishment of the farming, industry, distribution, and sales of
marijuana with a THC level of 3.0 percent or higher, using the alcohol
industry as a model, as long as the results support these intentions,
purposes and goals; and to provide for the farming, industry,
distribution, and sales of industrial hemp, which is hereby defined as
marijuana with a THC level of below 3.0 percent, using the cotton and
paper products industries as a model.
The effect of this act in its entirety and stated purpose is to be
liberally construed to favor individuals, and business entities
regarding the following:
(a) No taxes, fees, laws, rules, regulations, or local city and county
zoning requirements can be adopted or enacted to defeat these
commercial, agricultural and industrial purposes or individual civil
rights set forth in Civil Code section 54, Food and Agricultural Code
sections 54033 through 54035, inclusive, and Civil Code 52.1, and all
medical conditions as stated in Health and Safety Code section 11362.5,
and
(b) No regulations, taxes or fees shall be enacted or imposed which are
more severe or restrictive than those for comparable and reasonable
usage in the commercial alcohol industry model, including but not
limited to, for farming, planting, cultivating, irrigating, harvesting,
processing, storing, brokering, selling, distributing, and establishing
of cooperatives or collective associations.
The People further direct and order all state and local government
elected, appointed and hired employees, officers and officials to
refuse to cooperate with federal officials, for marijuana eradication
or other purpose or operate under U.S. contract or arrangement, to
defeat this act directly or indirectly, or to follow or abide by any
federal laws or regulations that are in conflict with this act.
Further, no such person acting alone, or with any other person or
legislative body, may contract or agree to cooperate with federal
officials, employees, agencies or departments to obtain any money,
property, gain or advantage by the eradication, arrest, prosecution,
conviction or deprivation of property of anyone acting within the
provisions of this act. Any such governmental person or public
agents who knowingly and intentionally violate these provisions shall
not have immunity and shall be individually liable for a fine of not
less than $7,500 for each occurrence.
The People further direct and order that within 30 days of
passage, both the state Attorney General and the Department of
Health Services shall inform the United States Department of Health and
Human Services, Attorney General, Congress, and Food and Drug
Administration that in 1996 California recognized that using marijuana
can have some positive medical effects, and for that reason demand
and.or petition for the removal of marijuana as a U.S. class 1 drug.
The People further direct and order the Attorney General of California
to protect the provisions of this act from any and all attacks,
whether from individuals, cities, counties, the state or federal
governments.
This Act expressly enjoins the arrest, prosecution, and imposition of
any criminal or civil penalties for people 21 years of age and older
who are acting within the provisions of this act, including all
california penal, civil, and nuisance laws, penalties, and zoning
regulations that are not applicable to the alcohol industry, excepting
those affecting medical marijuana at Health & Safety Code sections
11362.5, and 11362.7 et seq.
This Act expressly enjoins any and all commercial advertising of the
sales, distribution and use of marijuana, except for medical marijuana
and products made from industrial hemp, as defined herein, and this
injunction shall be enforced by penalties as shall hereafter be set
forth by the legislature.
This Act, with the intent of treating marijuana like alcohol,
expressly does not repeal, modify or change any present laws or
regulations prohibiting the driving of a motor vehicle while impaired
by marijuana; using or being impaired by marijuana in public or in the
workplace; providing, transferring or selling marijuana to a person
under the age of 21; the use, possession, cultivation, furnishing,
sales, transporting, or storing on premises of marijuana by
people under the age of 21; or medical marijuana statutes as set forth
in California Proposition 215 and its progeny.
The legislature shall not modify, change, add to or subtract from, or
amend any part of this Act.
If any part of this Act is found by any court of competent jurisdiction
to be invalid or void, that finding shall not affect any of the
remaining provisions.
|
|